Vielen Dank, dass Sie eGame Casino heruntergeladen haben! Wenn Ihr Download noch nicht gestartet ist, bitte hier klicken, um die Kasino-Software. Wenn du Tiger vs Bear magst, könnte dir das auch gefallen: Guns N' Roses. Spielen. Cashanova. Spielen. Super Lucky Frog. Spielen. 37,€. Tiger vs Bear. Bereiten Sie sich auf das ultimative Kräftemessen aller Zeiten vor: Tiger gegen Bär! Wer gewinnt? Kostenfrei spielen Jetzt spielen Sie haben. Why, why, why and why do you fc barcelona live ticker to be such a lion fanboy? It was a bunch of typed stuff. Video of both fighting. All posts meekur be flaired. They are only slightly bigger on average. A tiger could definitely be stronger In some situations but most the time the bear will be slightly like very slightly stronger. And close observation of these animals in captivity shows that the luxemburg schweden was more courageous, and the lion relied on his mane as an intimidation factor, which barely helped him. Cougars are usually mph. If you are not, prove it. The white rhinoceros then tries an agile headbutt, but the elephant proves better with overwatch world championship seven-foot tusks. A tiger could never get to any vital organs on a bear that size with all that fur and fat. One the bear was old and less in shape than in his prime while the tiger was younger than the bear. Jaguars average a solid 50 mph.
See this post and the stickied comment for details. The following post types and comments have been deemed low-quality by the community and may be removed.
For more information click here. Overly broad, vague or opinion-reliant posts. Wonder Woman must be titled like "Thor Marvel vs.
Copy-pasta, Circlejerk or Meme derivative posts. Any posts that do not promote evidence-based debate. Subreddit vs Subreddit posts or other posts looking to get a rise out of other online communities Tumblr, 4chan, etc, etc.
Comments that are memes for the sake of memes will be removed as well. Comments consisting of a single image or gif to provoke drama or as a non-responsive reply to the thread.
Include detail when posting. Again, please see the suggested template above for more details. No one expects you to be a genius when it comes to every aspect of every character.
The penalty for breaking the rules of this sub, contributing to spam, trolling, or purposefully making things more difficult for the mods may include being banned.
We issue warnings if we believe the user means well but we are not obligated to do so. You can be banned for a first offense. Report rule breaking and leave rule enforcement to the mods.
Apologies go a long way if you mess up. To submit a battle, click the Goku vs Superman or Doom vs Vader button above. Yeah Siberian tigers are boss and can take on things of similar size, but not something with all those adaptations.
Polar bears are extra strong and they live off of a diet almost entirely of meat. Siberian Tigers often prey on brown bears that can weigh up to 1, pounds.
Just throwing some more info out there. I found a size comparison between the two. Looking at this I find it unlikely that the tiger would win.
Is that an argument? Are there any Siberian Tigers located around polar bears? Brown bears not polar bears. They are of similar size though when looking at the brown bears in eastern Russia.
Also tigers kill adults as well, not just babies. Can a Siberian Tiger kill a brown bear in a fight? A polar bear is not as different from an Easter Russian brown as you think.
No real damage is done. Sharpness means absolutely nothing with the power of these animals. One hit from a bear would do sooo much damage on the lean tiger.
You keep underestimating the fat. A hippo is one of the fattest, but notoriously one of the most dangerous. Theres nothing dopey and slow about them when they attack.
The upper weight limit for adult male grizzlies is lbs, while for adult male Siberian tigers is lbs. The grizzly has dense muscle, fat, and skin around its neck and head.
Plus, they are not slow. Watch a video of it swatting something. Seems everyone has their favorite….. If it were a narrow venue such as a cage, then they clash face to face.
This is a huge advantage for the bear as they use crushing blow as their primary weapon and a full on hit will crush and part of the tiger it hits.
Before you say the tiger has powerful forelimbs, consider how they use them slashing and grappling attacks. This serves them well in an ambush attack but is inferior to the bears crushing blows face to face.
In an open arena the tiger has a much better chance. Its agility and speed give it a better than fair chance of attacking a bear from behind.
In this scenario the bear is in trouble. The tiger has the strength to hold on and deliver a fatal bite to the back of the neck Even if it take multiple attempts to sever the spinal column, the bear will find it hard to dislodge the tiger and pretty much be helpless.
Both are vicious alpha predators with very different fighting styles and I can see either winning. Pretty much depends on which one gets their preferred encounter.
As to the tiger, I can see a tiger hunting bears. But I doubt it would choose a face to face encounter. Would a tiger hunt grizzlies?
I guess no and yes my guess is as good as yours due to Darwin. If the two did coexist and clashed, both combatants would likely receive mortal wounds.
A bear may be able to initially survive, but the deep slashes inflicted by the tiger would be subject to secondary infection. Likewise a tiger with broken bones from a grizzly attack may not be able to hunt and starve to death.
Stretch this out over centuries and you could see the more aggressive of both species dying earlier and being washing out of the genetic pool leaving only the ones smart enough to avoid each other to breed any carry on.
If you truly can not see how either could win then you dont understand both species. Has anyone ever watched the Ali Foreman fight Foreman that big thick have beat Muhammad Ali but brains swiftness and Agility and deadly accuracy will always outsmart the bigger more menacing opponent.
In every recorded fight between a tiger and a grizzly, the bear defeated the big cat. There are recorded events of grizzlies in Russia killing mature male tigers.
There are no records of a mature male grizzly ever being killed by a tiger. Toby, I really doubt that, do cite the sources. Circus performances by bears generally include some humiliating clown-type routine, quite unlike the vividly athletic, often aggressively fearsome big cat acts.
Tigers stalk because they can pounce fast. A Siberian tiger who attacked and pounced on a grizzly would soon find out badly it bit off more than it could chew.
The bear, after first absorbing everything the tiger could throw at it would then return the favor, over and over again. The tiger at tthat point will try to get away, but being too tired, is now lunch.
Other -wise please visit lndian forest and learn the the unknown truth of tiger….. We have Some historical records on tiger unbelievable grown male Bengal tiger could kill a man from a flying beat over 12 feet.
The important thing was ,it happened while an elephant ride. My final point will be, the full growned bangal tiger with 15 years old which is from forest nobody can win.
Because… Some temples had been telling us the tiger god… Even in kung fu why tiger could get main form instead of other beasts like bear and the lion.
This is how it would end. Video of both fighting. Best destroys big cat https: People really think a tiger will beat a grizzly bear here?
Even worse that so many think that. Go watch a video of two grizzlies fighting. The bears withstand it for long periods of time.
Its teeth are no bigger, its claws smaller, and it lacks the slow twitch torque the bears produce their power from.
You people need to go watch a grizzly fight video NOW. Bear fights are brutal — but tiger fights are just as brutal. The bear would have the edge for the killer blow hate to admit though tigers do kill larger prey than any bear people often forget so either has the means to kill the other.
When both fighters are more than strong enough to kill the other getting the first attack is important and that goes to the tiger but the grizzly would be able to hold ground better.
Do not underestimate how powerful the siberian tiger is though, while smaller than the largest bears it is still a big, solid beast.
Actually the largest land carnivore is the siberian tiger, as said all bears are ominivores or the case of the panda even herbivores by choice now lol.
One lethal blow from Grizzly is enough to put Tiger out of action. For I have indeed — previously posted — in this thread.
James I know, I would be wasting my time explaining you everything. You will ignore everything, just like you did with Rob, but still, the tiger cannot, would not, will not and never win this fight.
Although it can put up a good fight with him, more than a lion could do. Just think more logically man, the odds are against the tiger. Bear is far superior in terms of strength, power and size it could outmatch any big cat.
Swampy, Sadly, it seems you choose to remain an ignoramus.. If you are not, prove it.. The bear is just too huge for any big cat, pound for pound the big cats are stronger and more talented fighters.
Swampy, You simply fail to understand.. Check the real historical records as have been linked, in reality, bears usually lose to the big cats..
One shows a tiger literally KO an Asian buffalo with a neck snap, within a herd.. Another shows a tiger wresting down, by main force, a huge bull-necked gaur..
The grizzly brown bear does not possess the applied skills to do either task.. Finally, you appear to show some realization..
You think lion would dominate every animal on the face of the planet… this, truly is depressing. And by the way, tiger fanboy! Boy, you need some milk!
At least I said a polar bear would win against Siberian tiger. You said lion would beat polar bear! Tiger easily beats lion.
If a lion an beat a polar bear, than Kevin Durant is my mom. Polar bear is three times larger than lion lol the lions dead.
Yeah, talk trash to me all day. Did you mis-spell your name? Check the actual evidence.. No, ghats not a fact. Ice bears are far stronger, bigger, fatter, to keep the lions teeth and claws from doing anything but sort of hurt it have more stamina, smarter, and with far more powerful deadly paw swipes.
Fat on bears is there to enable them to lie about semi-paralytic, lazing in a den, over winter.. Bears grapple with wrestle each other..
Check the video of the tiger knocking out the water buffalo.. This is a natural fact.. Ok, you want some? A puny captive caged lioness is not a prime pride boss male lion..
Are you kidding me? A black bear cub vs 12 tigers? Black bears sometimes dominate tigers. The other video was unavailable, so you will have to do better than that.
It was a bunch of typed stuff. I was going crazy. You want some funny videos? I put up that video — since its about as irrelevant as yours was..
For a coherent overview, see here: That is a completely irrelevant animal, though they are just grizzly bears on kodiak island. That has nothing to do with this fight.
So try to stay on topic boy. Lion pride-boss in his prime — still outbeasts the tiger, though.. I do spit on your trash, since it is such bear-grade stuff..
Buffalo natural kill lions. The fact that you claim a lion will defeat a 3 ton rhino, proves you are insane. You really think nothing can beat lion, can you?
We truly are all laughing at you James. I wrote that elephants are natural prey items for lions.. Why do you think that bears do not live in Africa anymore?
The hunt is a show, you idiot. Please, tell me why a lion can kill a tiger. This is the size difference. A killer tiger would destroy a lion in a fight.
Even a South Chinese tiger would beat a lion. By the way, here is proof that the tiger is bigger than the lion: The last question is: Which is the biggest big cat?
You better get them all right. A liger would destroy a lion in a fight. One being bigger than the other. That mega fat lion is way too fat for combat.
The website also said average African lions are pounds. You say that website was accurate which it was yet hear you are saying lion are bigger than tigers.
Also, that quiz was from National Geographic, which is the best site, no other site is as accurate as it, because they actually film the animals and have discovered that tigers are bigger than lions.
The quiz says tigers are bigger, which is made by National Geographic, and unless you have a better source than National Geographic, just shut up.
I know this because my aunt works their. Please, do so present a site better than National Geographic. Rob is not my buddy we are actually arguing right now.
Tigers and bears are on a whole different level. You got an Aspergers syndrome diagnosis yet? You also know that Nat Geo, which you put so much store in, duly notes that..
The lion is pounds at max. The bear is 1, pounds at max. Tigers on the other hand, use their brains when they fight bear. They have won the majority of fights.
Atlas bears became extinct due to over hunting by humans. Btw, Lions do not kill 6 ton bush elephants on one one. They avoid big daddy like the plague.
Atlas bears, a form of brownie.. James, how much longer are you going to post bullshit like this? Lions do not have more stamina than Kodiak or Polar bears.
Their paw and bite force are also inferior. They are built for speed and quick kills. Bears have been filmed fighting for hours to exert dominance over a herd.
You know this is true. That info can be found on many unbiased websites backed by true scientific research. Hell, if I wanted too, I could make a website that says an earthworm would beat a rhino.
Some idiot out there would believe it too. I keep using conformation bias because it fits you like a shrunken T-Shirt. Held in awe by Native American Indians, classic characters in folklore, feared, trapped, hunted, displayed in zoos and made to perform in circuses, the bear has long had a complicated relationship with humans.
Considered by many wildlife biologists to be one of the most intelligent land animals of North America,.
Zookeepers and animal trainers consider bears to be smarter than dogs. Like humans, bears are omnivores. And bears remember familiar animals for years, recognizing them and identifying their social status from a distance as far as 2, feet away.
To learn survival skills from their mother, cubs spend several years with her. She educates them about what plants are good to eat and where to find them.
By the time a juvenile bear leaves its mother, it knows what plant foods are available at each time of the season, and what habitats are likely to have those foods over a very large area.
That knowledge serves them well as they move into new areas, learning and remembering where new food sources are found in a new environment.
This knowledge is also critical to finding food when food sources change drastically from year to year depending upon weather and climate.
Zookeepers and animal trainers consider the bears intelligence to be greater than dogs. That puts them in the upper percentile of higher primates.
They blow lions and tigers out of the water in that category,. James, You continue to dig a deeper hole. I still have more ammo to bury you.
Fuck with the bull and you get the horns. There you have it. Omnivores are smarter than carnivores and herbivores. Looks like another category the feline loses in.
You think a male lion alone can beat an elephant! Lions are a whole level lower, maybe at the jaguars level, even a bit lower maybe.
How did you write a long comment? By the way, tigers are much smarter than bears. They simply have developed a hunting technique that is just too complicated for bears.
Hell, a bear could beat a tiger. I just think the Siberian tiger has more advantages. Thank you for putting up a good debate, unlike James. I think rob knows that tigers naturally see bears as prey, but prefers trolling..
Are you a scientist? You are the only person here who says that. Yeah, well the Siberian tiger is You really are giving the weakest argument here.
If you actually read — what I wrote.. Apart from the jaguar being a scaled down version, of course. You have seen numerous videos showing lions hunting elephants..
I have also posted real wildlife video of male lions hunting.. Actually kid, its pretty funny when even your mentor in trolling, rob..
Fact is, tiger does naturally prey on bear.. Yeah, the jaguar does get beat by lion and tiger. But tiger beats lion.
I have listed countless facts why the lion would win. Why do you keep going on about irrelevant stuff, which you just made up? Seems likely, you maybe have mental development deficiencies, like rob, huh kid..
Tiger hunts bear, its a natural fact.. I know tigers hunt bears. I have agreed with you for this fight on this thread.
However, the tiger wins against lion. Looks like you were making stuff up, man. But it does happen. Loo up lion vs tiger national geographic. No, its not there.
No, its not there, either, — is it kid.. I see that you, are even more insane then usual. Therefore, I am not listening to a word you say.
Are you an idiot or a flamer? I thing that the grizzly has the advantage because the have huge claws and powerful paws they have been known to break the backs of wolves and black Bears with one swipe.
I read a few people mention that tigers are used to hunting prey larger than the grizzly. Do any of you know just how large a full grown moose is?
And something like ft tall. You also compare the grizzly apparently on the same scale as the brown bear. The grizzly although a relative to the brown bear is much fiercer and larger.
When you see a brown bear in the woods, you just keep an eye on them. If you see a grizzly in the woods, you keep a gun on him.
Seems like a very biased article with no real facts from actual encounters. Back in roman era, exotic beast were pitted against each other for betting and show purpose.
They fed mostly on the great herds bufalo, now which are few. An Alaskan biologist from Montana told me these were the largest of the North American bears, including the Polar Bear.
In the Time-Life leather-bound books about the old west, one them stated death matches were held between plains grizzly bears vs lions and tigers for amusement and gambling.
The matches were held in either pits or cages. In all cases stated in the book, the plains grizzly won…in less than 60 seconds.
The lions and tigers had no chance to stalk or ambush. It was one on one, face to face, no chance to run. The Plains Grizzlies were like modern day MMA fighters on high protein diets all packed with muscle and fast.
James, man you are a feline fanboy; that too a very hardcore one. You are trying to make big cats sound like they are some kind of unbeatable killing machines, which was destined to kill.
Just remember they too have their limits and tendencies, for e. Oh, that idiot is a disgrace to animal research. Man, I thought you were long gone!
In fact, there is no need.. You can see for yourself on the wildlife videos, for such a masterly lion is truly..
Big cats are pretty lit, but to think they can take out elephants like James says… B. A tiger wins against both lion and bear.
In fact, their is no need either to imagine what a Grizzly bear can do. Certainly such a lardy layer is of negative value in a combat with a true killer..
Plus, any bear that has only ever felt the bite of his own kind — at worst.. The shit one comes across while drinking, the answer is one all over the net there are plenty of cage matches sadly enough where bears are put to fight big cats including tigers.
I have read that Siberian tigers prey on brown bears, but of course these are smaller than them not the really large ones. If you really think a tiger would win, I say, search the web for these clips.
For anyone who loves an animal, it is easy to see why people are so passionate on both sides but everything I saw in the unnatural habitat of a cage match showed a bear winning against lions, tigers, and even other bears — oh my.
I aint afraid to post the appropos vid-link.. Fact is, a prime boss big panthera — rips fat-as brownie.. Sorry about that vid-link..
You are the Idiot Tony. I can only hope you gain wisdom as you get older. You really need to open your mind young man. He meant Kodiak bears, as in grizzly bears, which are the same animal dumbass.
I still see you two idiots trying to debate facts. I gave up arguing with idiots like you and James. They take you down to their level and beat you with experience.
They are only slightly bigger on average. Siberian tigers hunt, kill and fight off Kamchatka bears. Put that together, idiot. Your sticky dumpster-derived bear crap stinks..
They do not have the same power A brown bear has significantly more swiping force than a S-Tiger. Bears are more fierce and has more weight.
If they both stand on their hind legs head on the bear will trample the tiger. BB, Do some research. Lay off the LSD.
A Tigers best chance is when a bear is hibernating or total surprise. Panthera bite is like-wise, that of a true killer-carnivore, not a garbage eater..
Lol a black bear from a southern climate. They are small and weak. Tigers have a far better chance against a huge grizzly or Kodiak than a flea bitten lion.
Or — if you do want to learn, then actually review the science, as in relevant published papers, via google scholar, instead. James, wow, does no amount of evidence convince you?
Most written accounts show tigers are greater than lions and I provided yet another source. Flea bitten tick infested lions depend on a pride to survive.
They must hunt with numbers because alone they seldom survive for too long. Bears and Tigers do it solo. Meaning you ignore — most — fact-checked evidence, because the facts — upset your over-valued fantasies..
Its a natural fact kid, learn to accept it. James, every time you insult me or Gary, you have to realize you still are giving no evidence to prove your point.
You simply dance around the subject. You just insult me and Gary seven eighths of the time, and the other one eighth, you just states your hopeless opinion.
Sad that my name Jack starts with the same letter as yours. I wish my name was Tony. There you go again. Yeah, I know tiger beats bear.
I use reliable sources, not garbage comments which eighty percent of the people are with me on the lion vs tiger thing.
All that proves is that bulk idiots abound — on sites like this. Dude, eighty percent of the people there have common sense!
And look at me with a straight face, and say National Geographic is a garbage resource. People like you, are idiots! You think a lion alone will take down a fully grown elephant.
Your so stupid, James. You think everyone except for you and a few other fanboys are idiots. Wake up, you stupid idiot!
The useless drivel that he is constantly spouting out is sheer bias. He never stated actual fact and all the links he provides are bogus. Lions have only one advantage and that is a mane to protect them from a neck bite.
Otherwise the Tiger has every physical advantage. Teeth, claws, strength, bite force to that of a Lion. He just needs to get over it. Furthermore you must have struggled in math.
Nowhere do I say a Tiger would typically defeat a grizzly or polar bear. I do however believe all 3 would dispatch a flea bitten lion the majority of the time.
Opinions are only as good as the facts which support them, kid. Grizzly bear is an dangerous adversary even for a male Tiger. Thats not quite fair,how about a siberian tiger the largest cat on the earth.
But against the largest bear on earth the kodiak brown bear,is all most twice as big and fearsest,as alion or tiger. Brown bear has the advantage unless a lucky kill by the line.
I am not referring to the grizzly bear but the big brown bear in Alaska that can go to pounds and over 11 feet tall. It would not be a contest if they were both alert the bear is packed with dense fat and muscle.
James W, Just like African lion vs Grizzly bear, this fight can go either way. The bear has the strength advantage, while the tiger has the speed and agility advantage.
For a human to be packed with dense fat is a bad thing. However, bears are different. They can hunt large prey like moose and bison.
Their bellies are the only parts which are fat. Their back, legs, and arms are muscle. That is pure muscle, which gives them strong forearms.
James W, Please do some research. You will learn that that hump, is actually muscle — that is why bears have strong forearms. Do some research about the fat protecting the bears to.
Also, big cats are better hunters, but when it comes to fighting, both bears and big cats are equally matched with a slight edge to the bear.
The key to victory for the tiger are its hind legs. When the two engage the hind legs with their long claws would seriously damage the torso of the bear.
So many of these comments are ridiculous, saying tigers win because they have been known to hunt brown bears.
Grizzlies are much heavier than tigers, and have much, much, much thicker hides and layers of fat. Tigers are designed to pierce through thinner hides and hunt with surprise attacks.
There is no difference between a grizzly bear and a brown bear. How can you be such a fool? Mountain lions are on the record as doing this to bears, so a massive Amur certainly would do it too, but in an even more savagely effective manner..
One scientific explanation for this that I read is that fat in the central area of your body provides more kinetic energy to the force of your arms.
You can be fat due to lack of exercise, or you can be fat just by nature but actually very physically fit. Bears are fat by nature: I think a big brown bear would win vs tiger mostly due to bone mass.
The reason we may think that tigers supposedly hunt bears is that its always the tiger that makes the choice to attack a bear.
And what tiger would ever try significantly risk his life? However, tigers are more technical when compared to the Grizzly Bear.
Grizzly bear is heavier, taller and longer than the Siberian tiger. Once there was a lack of natural prey in Russia and Siberian tiger killed the brown bear for its food.
North American Grizzly Bear and Siberian Tigers are solitary hunters, however, the Siberian tiger could easily take down its large prey and acts as the heaviest predators than Grizzly bear.
Siberian tigers are also known for killing a pack of 3 wolves, but Grizzly bear could not do it alone. The Siberian tigers are also known for killing the Asiatic black bears.
Since Grizzly bear is full of fat, it would be difficult for finding the grip on the grizzly bear neck as well as many other sensitive body parts.
Body fat of the grizzly bear protects him from the internal injury. Grizzly Bear and Siberian Tigers are the amazing and fierce hunter and fighter, so it would be quite interesting about who would win the battle.
Both the hunters can stand on the ground and maul with the front paws simultaneously. Grizzly bear tries to use with size to intimidate Tiger allowing to crush the rushing Tiger standing on its hind legs.
The Grizzly bear is quite powerful, the Siberian tiger could easily defeat the smaller bears and preys on them but most of the larger grizzly bears.
Until the Siberian Tigers hits the vulnerable spots, clawing its face and biting the neck of Grizzly bear, it would be quite difficult to overcome the bear.
Siberian Tigers would have more advantage over the grizzly bear as it is much quicker, faster, intelligent and cleverer than the grizzly.
Siberian Tigers also have the strong muscular body with the forelimbs when compared to the Grizzly. In fact, Siberian Tigers has the strongest muscular body when compared to another Carnivora predator.
According to Stats, History, and Facts, the Siberian Tigers have the upper hand compared to the grizzly bear to win the head to head fight.
Lizard vs Salamander fight comparison- who will win?